Messages

1

Substance Automation Toolkit - Discussions - Re: Highpass not working with automation toolkit?

 on: June 29, 2020, 12:30:02 pm 

Hello there,
I will take a look!
Can you please provide me repro steps and/or files that could be much appreciated.
Also SD and SAT versions please.
Thanks.

2

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: Unknown error rendering with sbsrender

 on: May 29, 2020, 10:27:21 am 

Hello!
Sbsrender's input must be an sbsar file. So, you have to cook your sbs file with the sbscooker before

3

Substance Automation Toolkit - Discussions - Re: How can I get UID of a specific node?

 on: February 26, 2020, 04:02:38 pm 

Hello Tracychen,
You mean with Pysbs, right?
It depends on your use case, but the UID is a member of the class SBSCompNode which the highest object for any kind of node in a graph.
A simple snippet example to list all UID node:

Code: [Select]

from pysbs import context, substance
ctx = context.Context()
doc = substance.SBSDocument(ctx, "your_sbs_file.sbs")
doc.parseDoc()
graph = doc.getSBSGraph('New_Graph')
nodes = graph.getAllNodes()
for node in nodes:
    print(node.mUID)


4

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: Today I cannot visit the website of SAT https://www.substance3d.com/products/sub

 on: February 21, 2020, 09:53:49 pm 

the new one:
https://www.substance3d.com/substance-automation-toolkit

5

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: Trouble with Mutator inputs

 on: February 21, 2020, 06:03:22 pm 

Hello!
Unfortunately, It seems to be a limitation of sbsmutator...
Effectively sbsmutator should support svg file as an input image, let's make a ticket to hopefully fix that for a next release.
As a workaround you can use PySbs module to edit your template and replace the input node by a SVG node.

Cheers.

6

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: Trouble setting up python api

 on: February 21, 2020, 05:47:03 pm 

Hey,
SAT and Designer python API are two different things and different products. SD python API is directly embedded in the Designer installation so you have nothing to do. Whereas SAT is a bunch of different tools and can be used separately from Designer, it is designed to automate and implement a substance workflow (as an instance in a production pipeline). In this bunch there is a python pip package: pysbs I invite you to learn more about pip package https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/ which is one of standard python package form.

So one way to install pysbs package correctly is to use pip to install it in the python interpreter site-packages:
From a terminal or a Powershell:

Code: [Select]

pip install /satinstallpath/Python\ API/Pysbs-2019.3.1.zipThis instruction will install pysbs for your default system python interpreter.

If your purpose is to use pysbs from the Designer python interpreter you have to append your PYTHONPATH system variable
with the parent pysbs directory path.
- extract (as a classic way) the content of /satinstallpath/Python\ API/Pysbs-2019.3.1.zip
- extraction result is a Pysbs-2019.3.1 directory
- append the path of this directory (Pysbs-2019.3.1) to the PYTHONPATH system variable
Another way (not really handy) is to append this parent directory (Pysbs-2019.3.1) directly in your python script thanks to:

Code: [Select]

import sys
sys.path.append("/satinstallpath/Python\ API/Pysbs-2019.3.1")
from pysbs import context

As you can see SAT deployment is very pipeline strategy dependent.

I hope these explanations clarified things.

7

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: SBSbaker Udim support

 on: February 20, 2020, 06:37:53 pm 

Hello!

1) Should this work with just using the textures embedded in the fbx file (tried obj as well)?
No sorry, it's not possible you have to use --texture-file flag.

2) Is there any udim support?
3) Is it able to handle multiple files for the textures provided (aka a texture file for every udim tile) ?
Yes it's supported with the flag --udim <udim> (ex: --udim 1001). But what is not supported is the iteration through all the mesh udim and the corresponding texture files. We are aware of this limitation, it's something we'd like to improve.


Cheers.

8

Substance Automation Toolkit - Product Support - Re: SBSRender processes hanging when rendering 4k maps.

 on: July 04, 2019, 06:51:28 pm 

Hey Nev!

Thanks for all these details!

We used to run sbsrender with multi-process pool in the pretty same context than you except Quadro card!
We will make some test with Quadro cards and open the discussion with engine team in order to resolve the issue.

I keep you informed.

Cheers.

9

Substance Automation Toolkit - Discussions - Re: Question about sbsbaker optimisation

 on: April 23, 2019, 01:54:36 pm 

Yes, you guessed right.
 It's a problem that we have in mind and it's planned to work on it to improve that.
At the moment, the best that you can do is to improve your code with parallelization maybe the best is a python multiprocessing pool.

10

Substance Automation Toolkit - Feature Request - Re: Sbsar plugin for Godot.

 on: April 23, 2019, 01:01:01 pm 

Hi,
It's more an Integration request than SAT, you can vote for it on:
https://allegorithmic.uservoice.com/forums/270786-integrations/suggestions/35709934-godot-substance-engine-integration

11

Substance Automation Toolkit - Discussions - Re: Get Node

 on: April 23, 2019, 12:50:36 pm 

Yes, be sure it is the UID of the node, common error is to use the UID of the instance. UID node is not displayed in SD gui.