Since the contest goal was to demonstrate proficiency in two software packages (Marvelous Designer & Substance). Should the judges not be judging on the advanced utilization of those packages ? Demonstrating advanced software knowledge ?
So for MD judges look for ....
1) use of custom stitches and borders.
2) use of buttons, glued trims.
3) different material properties.
4) integration of hard surface with soft cloth pieces.
For Substance Painter judges look for ....
1) use of complex material setup and application.
2) custom masking to apply different materials to different areas.
3) custom use of layer filters and effects.
4) custom use of grunge and dirt filters using smart masks to apply wear and tear.
5) application of smart masks like ' fabric edge wear ' , ' surface wear'.
None of those criteria were present in the judging for this contest. Instead the top selections convey a criteria of ' simple, layers, pretty, pink, super simplistic substance painter materials, overall gives me goosebumps '.
Is this not intended to augment / promote the advanced features of your software?
Next contest I would suggest having judges that -
1) personally can demonstrate art work that shows the above criteria and skill, to guarantee they are judging with a smart criteria in mind.
2) have a criteria list in mind, as those criteria convey that an artist is spending research, time and effort on the piece.
3) judge more than on 'goosebumps and simplicity' when analyzing a piece.
The majority of pieces were simple cloth layouts, with very minimal use of Substance and it's features. The judges may not have noticed that ?
Lastly starting your stream you showed work from MD that showed work that had the above criteria, advanced materials, complex use of the software. Then you 'dropped' into the top 3 for the contest. The difference between your intro images and your contest images was quite jarring. Next time outline criteria, then have judges that can recognize that criteria.
